Hall v. State
This text of 58 S.E. 558 (Hall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In order for this court to review a refusal to sanction an application for certiorari, the petition must be incorporated in the bill of exceptions or otherwise verified as a part thereof by the trial judge; an unsanetioned petition can not be specified as a part of the record. Lenney v. Finley, 118 Ga. 719, 45 S. E. 593; Wood v. Tattnall, 115 Ga. 1000, 42 S. E. 403; Tompkins v. Newnan, 120 Ga. 173, 47 S. E. 557; Anthony v. State, 112 Ga. 751, 38 S. E. 79; Evans v. Bloodworth, 105 Ga. 835, 31 S. E. 778; Central Ry. Co. v. Whitehead, 105 Ga. 492, 30 S. E. 814, and cases cited. Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 S.E. 558, 2 Ga. App. 437, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-state-gactapp-1907.