Hightower v. Davis

102 S.E. 34, 24 Ga. App. 689, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 457
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 27, 1920·No. 10950·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. An unsanetioned petition for certiorari can not be specified or sent up as part of-the record. It should be incorporated in the bill of exceptions or be verified as a part thereof by the trial judge. [690] Hall v. State, 2 Ga. App. 437 (58 S. E. 558), and cit.; McGovern v. Trammell, 14 Ga. App. 754 (82 S. E. 318).

Decided January 27, 1920. Petition for certiorari; from Fayette superior court—Judge Searcy. August 29, 1919. W. B. Hollingsivorth, for plaintiff in error. J. W. Culpepper, contra.

(a) An unsanctioned petition not incorporated in the bill of exceptions but specified and sent up as a part of the record is not sufficiently identified by the mere attaching to the bill of exceptions, and following the judge’s certificate, of the paper which purports to be the original petition, or a copy thereof, with the order refusing sanction. Sullivan v. Surrency, 15 Ga. App. 301, 303 (82 S. E. 926); Hollingsworth v. College Park, 17 Ga. App. 372 (86 S. E. 945.)

2. Under the above ruling the writ of error must be

Dismissed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hightower v. Davis, 102 S.E. 34, 24 Ga. App. 689, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 457 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

102 S.E. 34 (Hightower v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moore v. Southern Railway Co.
121 S.E. 138 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)