Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Whitehead
30 S.E. 814, 105 Ga. 492, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 605
Opinion
The fact that a judge of the superior court to whom a petition for certiorari is presented enters thereon and signs an order refusing 'to grant the writ does not constitute such petition a part of the record of the case to which it relates, and a certified copy of it can not be brought to this court as a portion of such record. Elsas v. Clay, 67 Ga. 327; James v. Davis, 76 Ga. 100; Fleming v. City of Bainbridge, 84 Ga. 622; Lake v. Kellum, 99 Ga. 130; Wilks v. Smith, 101 Ga. 229. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Whitehead, 30 S.E. 814, 105 Ga. 492, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 605 (Ga. 1898).
30 S.E. 814 (Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Whitehead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Blanchard v. Balkcom
122 S.E.2d 215 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1961)
Herrington v. City of Valdosta
192 S.E. 927 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Fleming v. State
158 S.E. 342 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Charles v. Bishop
117 S.E. 275 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Taylor v. Town of Omega
78 S.E. 144 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Hall v. State
58 S.E. 558 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Wood v. County of Tattnall
42 S.E. 403 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Evans v. Bloodworth
31 S.E. 778 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)