Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Lake v. Kellum

Lake v. Kellum

24 S.E. 874, 99 Ga. 130
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 23, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 24 S.E. 874 (Lake v. Kellum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lake v. Kellum, 24 S.E. 874, 99 Ga. 130 (Ga. 1896).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

The Supreme Court cannot determine whether a refusal to sanction a petition for certioranñ was or was not erroneous, where a copy of the petition is neither embodied in the bill of exceptions nor attached thereto .and verified by the judge. Such petition, not having been sanctioned, could not be lawfully filed, -and therefore was no part of the record, and could not be brought up as such. Elsas v. Clay, 67 Ga. 327; James v. Davis, 76 Ga. 100; Fleming v. City of Bainbridge, 84 Ga. 622.

Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blanchard v. Balkcom
122 S.E.2d 215 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1961)
Herrington v. City of Valdosta
192 S.E. 927 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Willie
133 S.E. 44 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Sullivan v. Surrency
82 S.E. 926 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Whitehead
30 S.E. 814 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Marchant v. City of Tifton
30 S.E. 254 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 S.E. 874, 99 Ga. 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lake-v-kellum-ga-1896.