Lake v. Kellum
24 S.E. 874, 99 Ga. 130
Opinion
The Supreme Court cannot determine whether a refusal to sanction a petition for certioranñ was or was not erroneous, where a copy of the petition is neither embodied in the bill of exceptions nor attached thereto .and verified by the judge. Such petition, not having been sanctioned, could not be lawfully filed, -and therefore was no part of the record, and could not be brought up as such. Elsas v. Clay, 67 Ga. 327; James v. Davis, 76 Ga. 100; Fleming v. City of Bainbridge, 84 Ga. 622.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lake v. Kellum, 24 S.E. 874, 99 Ga. 130 (Ga. 1896).
24 S.E. 874 (Lake v. Kellum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Blanchard v. Balkcom
122 S.E.2d 215 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1961)
Herrington v. City of Valdosta
192 S.E. 927 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Willie
133 S.E. 44 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Sullivan v. Surrency
82 S.E. 926 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Whitehead
30 S.E. 814 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Marchant v. City of Tifton
30 S.E. 254 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)