Marchant v. City of Tifton

Supreme Court of Georgia

Marchant v. City of Tifton

30 S.E. 254, 103 Ga. 573, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 177

DecidedMarch 1, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 30 S.E. 254 (Marchant v. City of Tifton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marchant v. City of Tifton, 30 S.E. 254, 103 Ga. 573, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 177 (Ga. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Lewis, J.

In a writ of error from a judgment of the superior court refusing-to sanction a petition for certiorari, it is necessary that a copy of the petition for certiorari be embodied in the bill of exceptions, or attached thereto and verified by the judge. The judge having refused to sanction the petition, the same can not be lawfully filed, and could not be brought up as a part of the record of the case. Lake v. Kellum, 99 Ga. 130.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewis, J.

In a writ of error from a judgment of the superior court refusing-to sanction a petition for certiorari, it is necessary that a copy of the petition for certiorari be embodied in the bill of exceptions, or attached thereto and verified by the judge. The judge having refused to sanction the petition, the same can not be lawfully filed, and could not be brought up as a part of the record of the case. Lake v. Kellum, 99 Ga. 130.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 S.E. 254, 103 Ga. 573, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marchant-v-city-of-tifton-ga-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack