Fleming v. State

158 S.E. 342, 43 Ga. App. 175, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 232
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 14, 1931
Docket21007
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 158 S.E. 342 (Fleming v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fleming v. State, 158 S.E. 342, 43 Ga. App. 175, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 232 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The bill of exceptions in this ease, which complains of the judge’s refusal to sanction a petition for certiorari, must be dismissed because the unsanctioned petition for certiorari was not incorporated in the bill of exceptions nor otherwise verified by the judge, but was merely sent up as a part of the record. A petition for certiorari does not become a part of the record until after it has been sanctioned. Such a petition for certiorari can not be considered by this court. Anthony v. State, 112 Ga. 751 (38 S. E. 79), and cit. “The fact that a judge of the superior court to whom a petition for certiorari is presented enters thereon and signs an order refusing to grant the writ does not constitute such petition a part of the record of the case to which it relates, and a certified copy of it can not be brought to this court as a portion of such record.” Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Whitehead, 105 Ga. 492 (30 S. E. 814), and cit.

Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fleming v. Lowry
162 S.E. 144 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 S.E. 342, 43 Ga. App. 175, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleming-v-state-gactapp-1931.