Stansell v. City of Conyers

94 S.E. 62, 21 Ga. App. 124, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 462
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 31, 1917
Docket8968
StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 62 (Stansell v. City of Conyers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stansell v. City of Conyers, 94 S.E. 62, 21 Ga. App. 124, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 462 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Harwell, J.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is not incorporated in the bill of exceptions or otherwise verified as a part thereof by the trial judge. Accordingly, this court is not able to review the judgment of the superior court in refusing to sanction the writ. See Hall v. State, 2 Ga. App. 437 (58 S. E. 558), and cases there cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hall v. State
58 S.E. 558 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 62, 21 Ga. App. 124, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stansell-v-city-of-conyers-gactapp-1917.