Hunt v. Mayor of Macon

75 S.E. 680, 11 Ga. App. 472, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 59
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 17, 1912·No. 4293·Published

Opinion

Pottle, J.

1. “In order for this court to review the refusal of the judge of the superior court to sanction a certiorari, the petition for certiorari must be incorporated in the bill of exceptions, or otherwise verified as a part thereof by the trial judge. An unsanctioned petition can not ' be specified as a part of the record. Clark v. Deal, 4 Ga. App. 326 (61 S. E. 295) ; Hall v. State, 2 Ga. App. 437 (58 S. E. 558).” Wimpey v. Gainesville, 6 Ga. App. 112 (64 S. E. 281). See, also, Hanlon v. Atlanta, 6 Ga. App. 786 (65 S. E. 815).

[473]*473Decided September 17, 1912. Petition for certiorari; from Bibb superior court — Judge Harris. June 5, 1913. G. A. Glawson, for plaintiff in error. A. W. Lane, B. W. Barnes, contra.

2. Being no part of the record, an nnsanctioned petition for certiorari must be identified by the certificate of the trial judge. A certificate from the clerk of the trial court that such a petition is a part of the bill of exceptions, when in fact it is not so, can not be considered.

Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunt v. Mayor of Macon, 75 S.E. 680, 11 Ga. App. 472, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 59 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

75 S.E. 680 (Hunt v. Mayor of Macon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. State
58 S.E. 558 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Clarke Bros. v. Deal
61 S.E. 295 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Wimpey v. Mayor of Gainesville
64 S.E. 281 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Hanlon v. City of Atlanta
65 S.E. 815 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)