Hunt v. Mayor of Macon
This text of 75 S.E. 680 (Hunt v. Mayor of Macon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. “In order for this court to review the refusal of the judge of the superior court to sanction a certiorari, the petition for certiorari must be incorporated in the bill of exceptions, or otherwise verified as a part thereof by the trial judge. An unsanctioned petition can not ' be specified as a part of the record. Clark v. Deal, 4 Ga. App. 326 (61 S. E. 295) ; Hall v. State, 2 Ga. App. 437 (58 S. E. 558).” Wimpey v. Gainesville, 6 Ga. App. 112 (64 S. E. 281). See, also, Hanlon v. Atlanta, 6 Ga. App. 786 (65 S. E. 815).
2. Being no part of the record, an nnsanctioned petition for certiorari must be identified by the certificate of the trial judge. A certificate from the clerk of the trial court that such a petition is a part of the bill of exceptions, when in fact it is not so, can not be considered.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 S.E. 680, 11 Ga. App. 472, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-mayor-of-macon-gactapp-1912.