Gossett v. City of Atlanta

63 S.E. 143, 5 Ga. App. 357, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 121
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 22, 1908
Docket1467
StatusPublished

This text of 63 S.E. 143 (Gossett v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gossett v. City of Atlanta, 63 S.E. 143, 5 Ga. App. 357, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 121 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

This court can not review a refusal to sanction an. application for certiorari, unless the petition for certiorari be incorporated in the bill of exceptions, or otherwise verified’ by the trial judge as a part' thereof. A petition for certiorari does not become a part of the record until granted; and, therefore, if the error assigned in the bill of exceptions be the refusal of the court to -grant the writ of certiorari, and the petition for certiorari comes up in the record’ with no other identification than the usual certificate of the clerk, the writ of error will be dismissed. Hall v. State, 2 Ga. App. 437 (58 S. E. 558), and cases there cited. Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hall v. State
58 S.E. 558 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 S.E. 143, 5 Ga. App. 357, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gossett-v-city-of-atlanta-gactapp-1908.