Gomez v. State

710 So. 2d 1384, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7183, 1998 WL 314740
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gomez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 751 So. 2d 630
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 17, 1998·No. No. 97-2112·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We remand to the trial court with the direction that appellant receive credit for 229 days time served against his sentence. Unlike Harmon v. State, 599 So.2d 754 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), the record does not demonstrate that the trial court’s original pronouncement was incorrect. Also, based on the concession by the state, we reverse the restitution award and remand for a restitution hearing. See Hamrick v. State, 648 So.2d 274 (Fla. 4th [1385]*1385DCA 1995). We find no error in the admission of the gun at trial.

STONE, C.J., and FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gomez v. State, 710 So. 2d 1384, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7183, 1998 WL 314740 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

710 So. 2d 1384 (Gomez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hamrick v. State
648 So. 2d 274 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Harmon v. State
599 So. 2d 754 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)