Gomez v. State
681 So. 2d 933, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11395, 1996 WL 625927
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gomez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14860 →
Opinion
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing evidence of collateral sex crimes where both the charged offenses and the collateral crimes occurred in a familial setting and where the collateral crimes were sufficiently similar to the charged offenses. See Saffor v. State, 660 So.2d 668, 672 (Fla.1995); Shipman v. State, 668 So.2d 313 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gomez v. State, 681 So. 2d 933, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11395, 1996 WL 625927 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
681 So. 2d 933 (Gomez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shipman v. State
668 So. 2d 313 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Saffor v. State
660 So. 2d 668 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)