Gomez v. State

686 So. 2d 19, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6859, 1996 WL 354618
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gomez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 621 So. 2d 578
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 28, 1996·No. No. 94-02171·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pedro Gomez argues, and the state concedes, that the trial court erred in ordering restitution more than 60 days after entry of the original judgment and sentence, which did not include restitution. We agree. See State v. Sanderson, 626 So.2d 471 (Fla.1993). Accordingly, the restitution orders are vacated.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gomez v. State, 686 So. 2d 19, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6859, 1996 WL 354618 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

686 So. 2d 19 (Gomez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frederick v. Woman's Hosp. of Acadiana
626 So. 2d 467 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1993)