Gomez v. State
686 So. 2d 19, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6859, 1996 WL 354618
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gomez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 621 So. 2d 578 →
Opinion
Pedro Gomez argues, and the state concedes, that the trial court erred in ordering restitution more than 60 days after entry of the original judgment and sentence, which did not include restitution. We agree. See State v. Sanderson, 626 So.2d 471 (Fla.1993). Accordingly, the restitution orders are vacated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gomez v. State, 686 So. 2d 19, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6859, 1996 WL 354618 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
686 So. 2d 19 (Gomez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Frederick v. Woman's Hosp. of Acadiana
626 So. 2d 467 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1993)