Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Gomez v. State

Gomez v. State

621 So. 2d 578, 1993 WL 277088
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 27, 1993·No. 92-2519·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

621 So.2d 578 (1993)

Eyvor A. GOMEZ, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 92-2519.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 27, 1993.

*579 Kaeiser & Potolsky, Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Linda S. Katz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and COPE, JJ.

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

We entirely agree with the trial court and Freeman v. State, 611 So.2d 1260 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), that no double jeopardy violation is involved in the prosecution of a D.U.I. charge after the defendant's driver's license has been seized, because of the same conduct, by the arresting officer pursuant to section 322.2615, Florida Statutes (1991). See Smith v. City of Gainesville, 93 So.2d 105 (Fla. 1957).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gomez v. State, 621 So. 2d 578, 1993 WL 277088 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

621 So. 2d 578 (Gomez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bolware v. State
33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 645 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)
State v. McClendon
131 Wash. 2d 853 (Washington Supreme Court, 1997)
Ex Parte Mata
925 S.W.2d 292 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
State v. Oliver
470 S.E.2d 16 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1996)
Stabler v. State
668 So. 2d 1034 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Helber v. State
915 S.W.2d 955 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Davidson v. MacKinnon
656 So. 2d 223 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
State v. Higa
897 P.2d 928 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1995)
State v. Murray
644 So. 2d 533 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)