Freeman v. State
This text of 594 So. 2d 834 (Freeman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Charles D. FREEMAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
*835 James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Stephen Krosschell, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Davis G. Anderson, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment and sentence. However, in our review of the record, we find no written order to conform to the trial court's oral pronouncement imposing a fee for the public defender service at the sentencing hearing. We, therefore, remand this case to the trial court to correct the judgment and sentence to conform with its oral pronouncement.
DANAHY, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
594 So. 2d 834, 1992 WL 35174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.