McKnight v. State

616 So. 2d 635, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4858, 1993 WL 125104
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 21, 1993·No. No. 92-01040·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s revocation of probation but remand for correction of the written order to conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement with respect to the public defender’s fee. See, e.g., Freeman v. State, 594 So.2d 834 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

LEHAN, C.J., and DANAHY and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKnight v. State, 616 So. 2d 635, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4858, 1993 WL 125104 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

616 So. 2d 635 (McKnight v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tessier v. State
620 So. 2d 266 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)