Tessier v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tessier v. State

620 So. 2d 266, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7507, 1993 WL 242662

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 2, 1993

DocketNo. 93-343

StatusPublished

This text of 620 So. 2d 266 (Tessier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tessier v. State, 620 So. 2d 266, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7507, 1993 WL 242662 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is taken from an order revoking probation. Appellant contends the trial court erred in failing to articulate the specific grounds for the revocation. The order of revocation of probation is amended to reflect that appellant violated the terms and conditions of his probation by his unauthorized absence from the Probation and Restitution Center on May 11, 1992, and by absconding from the Probation and Restitution Center on May 12, 1992. As amended, the order of revocation of probation is affirmed. See Gore v. State, 616 So.2d 189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Hogwood v. State, 615 So.2d 780 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Brundage v. State, 593 So.2d 1227 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); McKnight v. State, 616 So.2d 635 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Joseph v. State, 615 So.2d 833 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

SMITH, JOANOS and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is taken from an order revoking probation. Appellant contends the trial court erred in failing to articulate the specific grounds for the revocation. The order of revocation of probation is amended to reflect that appellant violated the terms and conditions of his probation by his unauthorized absence from the Probation and Restitution Center on May 11, 1992, and by absconding from the Probation and Restitution Center on May 12, 1992. As amended, the order of revocation of probation is affirmed. See Gore v. State, 616 So.2d 189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Hogwood v. State, 615 So.2d 780 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Brundage v. State, 593 So.2d 1227 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); McKnight v. State, 616 So.2d 635 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Joseph v. State, 615 So.2d 833 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

SMITH, JOANOS and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

620 So. 2d 266, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7507, 1993 WL 242662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tessier-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack