Hogwood v. State
This text of 615 So. 2d 780 (Hogwood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Willis Aubrey HOGWOOD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
*781 John M. Jones, Fernandina Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Carolyn Mosley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
MICKLE, Judge.
This appeal is from an order revoking Hogwood's probation. We affirm the revocation. However, remand is required to correct the order revoking probation to conform to the oral pronouncements at the revocation hearing, during which the trial court revoked probation solely on the ground Hogwood violated the condition that he not use intoxicants to excess. State concedes the point. See Earle v. State, 519 So.2d 757 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Dantler v. State, 584 So.2d 198 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Gardner v. State, 569 So.2d 532 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
BOOTH and KAHN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
615 So. 2d 780, 1993 WL 64486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hogwood-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.