Villanueva v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Villanueva v. State

637 So. 2d 350, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5299, 1994 WL 234522

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 31, 1994·No. No. 94-212·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order revoking the appellant’s probation is affirmed with one modification. The subject order is modified by striking the finding therein that the appellant violated condition number six of his probation; this modification is necessary so as to conform to the trial court’s oral findings at the conclusion of the probation revocation hearing. See Banks v. State, 626 So.2d 314 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Hogwood v. State, 615 So.2d 780 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Fairman v. State, 576 So.2d 948 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); King v. State, 451 So.2d 948 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order revoking the appellant’s probation is affirmed with one modification. The subject order is modified by striking the finding therein that the appellant violated condition number six of his probation; this modification is necessary so as to conform to the trial court’s oral findings at the conclusion of the probation revocation hearing. See Banks v. State, 626 So.2d 314 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Hogwood v. State, 615 So.2d 780 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Fairman v. State, 576 So.2d 948 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); King v. State, 451 So.2d 948 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Affirmed as modified.

Villanueva v. State, 637 So. 2d 350, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5299, 1994 WL 234522 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

637 So. 2d 350 (Villanueva v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related