Villanueva v. State

637 So. 2d 350, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5299, 1994 WL 234522
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 31, 1994
DocketNo. 94-212
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 637 So. 2d 350 (Villanueva v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Villanueva v. State, 637 So. 2d 350, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5299, 1994 WL 234522 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order revoking the appellant’s probation is affirmed with one modification. The subject order is modified by striking the finding therein that the appellant violated condition number six of his probation; this modification is necessary so as to conform to the trial court’s oral findings at the conclusion of the probation revocation hearing. See Banks v. State, 626 So.2d 314 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Hogwood v. State, 615 So.2d 780 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Fairman v. State, 576 So.2d 948 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); King v. State, 451 So.2d 948 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lainez v. State
642 So. 2d 849 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
637 So. 2d 350, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5299, 1994 WL 234522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/villanueva-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.