Banks v. State

626 So. 2d 314, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11412, 1993 WL 458978
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 10, 1993·No. No. 92-3027·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The written order of the trial court indicates that the defendant’s probation was revoked because he violated four of its terms. The court actually dismissed three of the alleged violations and announced that, the only condition breached was the one requiring him to file monthly reports. We therefore reverse the order and instruct that on remand the trial court conform the written order to its oral pronouncement.

REVERSED.

DELL, C.J., and STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Banks v. State, 626 So. 2d 314, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11412, 1993 WL 458978 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

626 So. 2d 314 (Banks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Villanueva v. State
637 So. 2d 350 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)