Banks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Banks v. State

626 So. 2d 314, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11412, 1993 WL 458978

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 10, 1993

DocketNo. 92-3027

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 626 So. 2d 314 (Banks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Banks v. State, 626 So. 2d 314, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11412, 1993 WL 458978 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The written order of the trial court indicates that the defendant’s probation was revoked because he violated four of its terms. The court actually dismissed three of the alleged violations and announced that, the only condition breached was the one requiring him to file monthly reports. We therefore reverse the order and instruct that on remand the trial court conform the written order to its oral pronouncement.

REVERSED.

DELL, C.J., and STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The written order of the trial court indicates that the defendant’s probation was revoked because he violated four of its terms. The court actually dismissed three of the alleged violations and announced that, the only condition breached was the one requiring him to file monthly reports. We therefore reverse the order and instruct that on remand the trial court conform the written order to its oral pronouncement.

REVERSED.

DELL, C.J., and STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

626 So. 2d 314, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11412, 1993 WL 458978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banks-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack