McKnight v. State

564 So. 2d 159, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4436, 1990 WL 82457
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 19, 1990
DocketNo. 89-1388
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 564 So. 2d 159 (McKnight v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKnight v. State, 564 So. 2d 159, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4436, 1990 WL 82457 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles McKnight appeals his conviction for armed robbery. We conclude first that there was no violation of Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971). See Bush v. State, 461 So.2d 936, 938 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031, 106 S.Ct. 1237, 89 L.Ed.2d 345 (1986). Second, we conclude that the firearm was properly admitted into evidence. Bega v. State, 100 So.2d 455, 457-58 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958). Finally, the evidence was sufficient to support McKnight’s conviction and the trial court properly denied the motion for judgment of acquittal. See Pressley v. State, 395 So.2d 1175, 1177 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 407 So.2d 1105 (Fla.1981).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Raines v. State
600 So. 2d 47 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
564 So. 2d 159, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4436, 1990 WL 82457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcknight-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.