McKnight v. State

564 So. 2d 159, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4436, 1990 WL 82457
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 19, 1990·No. No. 89-1388·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles McKnight appeals his conviction for armed robbery. We conclude first that there was no violation of Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971). See Bush v. State, 461 So.2d 936, 938 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031, 106 S.Ct. 1237, 89 L.Ed.2d 345 (1986). Second, we conclude that the firearm was properly admitted into evidence. Bega v. State, 100 So.2d 455, 457-58 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958). Finally, the evidence was sufficient to support McKnight’s conviction and the trial court properly denied the motion for judgment of acquittal. See Pressley v. State, 395 So.2d 1175, 1177 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 407 So.2d 1105 (Fla.1981).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKnight v. State, 564 So. 2d 159, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4436, 1990 WL 82457 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

564 So. 2d 159 (McKnight v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Raines v. State
600 So. 2d 47 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)