Raines v. State

600 So. 2d 47, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7731, 1992 WL 147147
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Raines v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 625 So. 2d 104
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 30, 1992·No. No. 92-647·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Curtis Lovett Raines appeals his conviction for burglary with an assault. We conclude, first, that there was suffi[48]*48cient evidence to support the conviction of defendant of that offense. See Hernandez v. State, 569 So.2d 938 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); McKnight v. State, 564 So.2d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Second, it was permissible for the trial court to charge the jury on the instant offense, as it was a lesser included offense of the main charge, burglary with an assault or battery with a handgun. See State v. Johnson, 601 So.2d 219 (Fla. May 28, 1992) (State entitled to instruction on necessarily and permissive lesser included offenses providing the evidence supports the charges).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raines v. State, 600 So. 2d 47, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7731, 1992 WL 147147 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

600 So. 2d 47 (Raines v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hernandez v. State
569 So. 2d 938 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
State v. Johnson
601 So. 2d 219 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
McKnight v. State
564 So. 2d 159 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)