Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Gomez v. State

Gomez v. State

710 So. 2d 1384, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7183, 1998 WL 314740
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 17, 1998
DocketNo. 97-2112
StatusPublished

This text of 710 So. 2d 1384 (Gomez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gomez v. State, 710 So. 2d 1384, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7183, 1998 WL 314740 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We remand to the trial court with the direction that appellant receive credit for 229 days time served against his sentence. Unlike Harmon v. State, 599 So.2d 754 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), the record does not demonstrate that the trial court’s original pronouncement was incorrect. Also, based on the concession by the state, we reverse the restitution award and remand for a restitution hearing. See Hamrick v. State, 648 So.2d 274 (Fla. 4th [1385]*1385DCA 1995). We find no error in the admission of the gun at trial.

STONE, C.J., and FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hamrick v. State
648 So. 2d 274 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Harmon v. State
599 So. 2d 754 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
710 So. 2d 1384, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7183, 1998 WL 314740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gomez-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.