Shipman v. State

666 So. 2d 1042, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 653, 1996 WL 33959
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 30, 1996
DocketNo. 94-3511
StatusPublished

This text of 666 So. 2d 1042 (Shipman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shipman v. State, 666 So. 2d 1042, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 653, 1996 WL 33959 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s motion to withdraw his nolo contendere plea, as we find the motion legally insufficient on its face.

BOOTH, WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
666 So. 2d 1042, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 653, 1996 WL 33959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shipman-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.