Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Shipman v. State

Shipman v. State

666 So. 2d 1042, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 653, 1996 WL 33959
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shipman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 668 So. 2d 313 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 30, 1996·No. No. 94-3511·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s motion to withdraw his nolo contendere plea, as we find the motion legally insufficient on its face.

BOOTH, WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shipman v. State, 666 So. 2d 1042, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 653, 1996 WL 33959 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

666 So. 2d 1042 (Shipman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.