Gomez v. State

756 So. 2d 259, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5247, 2000 WL 525652
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 3, 2000·No. No. 3D00-922·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

George Gomez appeals the denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence. Although the trial court correctly decided Gomez’s motion at the time of the hearing, the Florida Supreme Court’s subsequent decision in Heggs v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S137, — So.2d -, 2000 WL 178052 (Fla.February 17, 2000) holding chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, unconstitutional warrants a reversal here, furthermore, Gomez falls within the window prescribed in Heggs as the offenses convicted of occurred on December 15, 1995. See Heggs v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S137, — So.2d -, 2000 WL 178052 (Fla.February 17, 2000).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court for a determination of Gomez’s proper sentence under the 1994 sentencing guidelines.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gomez v. State, 756 So. 2d 259, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5247, 2000 WL 525652 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

756 So. 2d 259 (Gomez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rivera v. State
758 So. 2d 1270 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)