Gomez v. State

745 So. 2d 571, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16641, 1999 WL 1127738
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gomez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 751 So. 2d 630
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 10, 1999·No. No. 99-696·Published

Opinion

ORFINGER, M., Senior Judge.

In February 1997, appellant entered a plea of guilty to possession of a concealed firearm and was placed on probation. In November of 1997, his probation was revoked based on his admitted violations and he was sentenced to a term in prison. His guidelines scoresheet included 18 points for possession of a firearm, which he contends makes his sentence illegal, based on White v. State, 714 So.2d 440 (Fla.1998), which he says should be retroactively applied. This court has already held that White is not to be applied retroactively, see Mathis v. State, 719 So.2d 348 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), and despite appellant’s argument, we are not persuaded that the issue was incorrectly decided. See also, Smith v. State, 737 So.2d 577 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Appellant’s sentence was legal when imposed, and the trial court did not err in denying his motion to correct it.

AFFIRMED.

ANTOON, C.J., and THOMPSON, J„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gomez v. State, 745 So. 2d 571, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16641, 1999 WL 1127738 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

745 So. 2d 571 (Gomez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

White v. State
714 So. 2d 440 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Mathis v. State
719 So. 2d 348 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Smith v. State
737 So. 2d 577 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)