Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate
This text of 625 F.3d 1182 (Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Order; Dissent by Chief Judge KOZINSKI; Dissent by Judge REINHARDT; Concurrence by Judge BEEZER.
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Graber and Fisher vote to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Beezer so recommends.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
625 F.3d 1182, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 23194, 2010 WL 4400428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-ex-rel-doe-v-kamehameha-schoolsbernice-pauahi-bishop-estate-ca9-2010.