Grutter v. Bollinger

Supreme Court

Grutter v. Bollinger

538 U.S. 904, 71 U.S.L.W. 3576

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 10, 2003

Docket02-241

StatusPublished

This text of 538 U.S. 904 (Grutter v. Bollinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grutter v. Bollinger, 538 U.S. 904, 71 U.S.L.W. 3576 (2003).

Pincite

Opinion

C. A. 6th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 537 U. S. 1043.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted. Motion of Exxon Mobil Corp. for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of respondents Kimberly James et al. for enlargement of argument time and for divided argument, or in the alternative, for divided argument denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. 6th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 537 U. S. 1043.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted. Motion of Exxon Mobil Corp. for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of respondents Kimberly James et al. for enlargement of argument time and for divided argument, or in the alternative, for divided argument denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

538 U.S. 904, 71 U.S.L.W. 3576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grutter-v-bollinger-scotus-2003.