Grutter v. Bollinger

538 U.S. 904, 71 U.S.L.W. 3576
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Grutter v. Bollinger. Read the opinion of the Court — 539 U.S. 306
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 10, 2003·No. 02-241·Published

Opinion

C. A. 6th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 537 U. S. 1043.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted. Motion of Exxon Mobil Corp. for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of respondents Kimberly James et al. for enlargement of argument time and for divided argument, or in the alternative, for divided argument denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grutter v. Bollinger, 538 U.S. 904, 71 U.S.L.W. 3576 (2003).

538 U.S. 904 (Grutter v. Bollinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.