Diaz v. Brewer
This text of 676 F.3d 823 (Diaz v. Brewer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Order; Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN.
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny defendants-appellants’ petition for panel rehearing. Judge Thomas has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Schroeder and Bennett have so recommended.
[824]*824The full court was advised of defendants-appellants’ petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
Defendants-appellants’ petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
676 F.3d 823, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 6623, 114 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1095, 2012 WL 1109335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diaz-v-brewer-ca9-2012.