FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 115
Certain acts, records, and proceedings and the effect thereof
28 U.S.C. § 1738C
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter115 — EVIDENCE; DOCUMENTARY
Current throughPub. L. 119-99
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1738C (Certain acts, records, and proceedings and the effect thereof) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1738C.
Text
(a)In General.—No person acting under color of State law may deny—
(1)full faith and credit to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State pertaining to a marriage between 2 individuals, on the basis of the sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin of those individuals; or
(2)a right or claim arising from such a marriage on the basis that such marriage would not be recognized under the law of that State on the basis of the sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin of those individuals.
(b)Enforcement by Attorney General.—The Attorney General may bring a civil action in the appropriate United States district court against any person who violates subsection (a) for declaratory and injunctive relief.
(c)Private Right of Action.—Any person who is harmed by a violation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Marriage of LaFleur & Pyfer
2021 CO 3 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 2021)
In re the Marriage of Dean LAFLEUR v. Timothy PYFER
479 P.3d 869 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 2021)
Goodridge v. Department of Public Health
440 Mass. 309 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2003)
in Re State of Texas
466 S.W.3d 783 (Texas Supreme Court, 2015)
Windsor v. United States
699 F.3d 169 (Second Circuit, 2012)
In Re Marriage Cases
183 P.3d 384 (California Supreme Court, 2008)
Kitchen v. Herbert
755 F.3d 1193 (Tenth Circuit, 2014)
Hernandez v. Robles
855 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public Health
957 A.2d 407 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2008)
Robin Joy Shahar v. Michael J. Bowers, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Georgia
114 F.3d 1097 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)
Miller-Jenkins v. Miller-Jenkins
661 S.E.2d 822 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 2008)
Cote-Whitacre v. Department of Public Health
446 Mass. 350 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2006)
Knight v. Superior Court
26 Cal. Rptr. 3d 687 (California Court of Appeal, 2005)
Chambers v. Ormiston
935 A.2d 956 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 2007)
Andersen v. King County
158 Wash. 2d 1 (Washington Supreme Court, 2006)
Kitchen v. Herbert
961 F. Supp. 2d 1181 (D. Utah, 2013)
Smelt v. County of Orange
447 F.3d 673 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Jack Pidgeon and Larry Hicks v. Mayor Sylvester Turner and City of Houston
538 S.W.3d 73 (Texas Supreme Court, 2017)
In Re: Estate of Carter, S., Appeal of: Hunter, M.
159 A.3d 970 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)
Martinez v. County of Monroe
50 A.D.3d 189 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 117–228, §4, Dec. 13, 2022, 136 Stat. 2305.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Prior Provisions
A prior section 1738C, added Pub. L. 104–199, §2(a), Sept. 21, 1996, 110 Stat. 2419, related to effect not required to be given to certain acts, records, and proceedings of another jurisdiction regarding marriage between persons of the same sex, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 117–228, §3, Dec. 13, 2022, 136 Stat. 2305.
Prior Provisions
A prior section 1738C, added Pub. L. 104–199, §2(a), Sept. 21, 1996, 110 Stat. 2419, related to effect not required to be given to certain acts, records, and proceedings of another jurisdiction regarding marriage between persons of the same sex, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 117–228, §3, Dec. 13, 2022, 136 Stat. 2305.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1738C, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1738C.