CLS Bank International v. Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd.

717 F.3d 1269, 106 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1696, 2013 WL 1920941, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 9493
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided May 10, 2013·No. 2011-1301·Published·Cited by 121 cases

Opinions

Opinion for the court filed PER CURIAM.

Concurring opinion filed by LOURIE, Circuit Judge, in which DYK, PROST, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges, join.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration en banc, a majority of the court affirms the district court’s holding that the asserted method and computer-readable media claims are not directed to eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. An equally divided court affirms the district court’s holding that the asserted system claims are not directed to eligible subject matter under that statute.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CLS Bank International v. Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd., 717 F.3d 1269, 106 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1696, 2013 WL 1920941, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 9493 (Fed. Cir. 2013).

717 F.3d 1269 (CLS Bank International v. Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related