City of Burlington v. Dague

502 U.S. 1071, 112 S. Ct. 964
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 27, 1992
DocketNo. 91-810
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 502 U.S. 1071 (City of Burlington v. Dague) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Burlington v. Dague, 502 U.S. 1071, 112 S. Ct. 964 (1992).

Opinion

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “May a court, in determining a reasonable attorney’s fee award under § 7002(e) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, 90 Stat. 2826, as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 6972(e), or § 505(d) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act), 86 Stat. 889, as amended, 33 U. S. C. § 1365(d), enhance the fee award above the lodestar amount in order to reflect the fact that the attorneys had taken the case on a contingent-fee basis, thus assuming the risk of receiving no attorney’s fees at all?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
502 U.S. 1071, 112 S. Ct. 964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-burlington-v-dague-scotus-1992.