City of Burlington v. Dague

502 U.S. 1071, 112 S. Ct. 964
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 27, 1992·No. No. 91-810·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “May a court, in determining a reasonable attorney’s fee award under § 7002(e) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, 90 Stat. 2826, as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 6972(e), or § 505(d) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act), 86 Stat. 889, as amended, 33 U. S. C. § 1365(d), enhance the fee award above the lodestar amount in order to reflect the fact that the attorneys had taken the case on a contingent-fee basis, thus assuming the risk of receiving no attorney’s fees at all?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Burlington v. Dague, 502 U.S. 1071, 112 S. Ct. 964 (1992).

502 U.S. 1071 (City of Burlington v. Dague) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related