Cameron v. Johnson
This text of 381 U.S. 741 (Cameron v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appellants brought this action, inter alia, under § 1979 of the Revised Statutes, 42 U. S. C. § 1983 (1958 ed.), to enjoin enforcement of the Mississippi Anti-Picketing statute,
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the cause remanded for reconsideration in light of Domhrowski v. Pfister, 380 U. S. 479. On remand, the District Court should first consider whether 28 U. S. C. § 2283 (1958 ed.) bars a federal injunction in this case, see 380 U. S., at 484, n. 2. If § 2283 is not a bar, the court should then deter[756]*756mine whether relief is proper in light of the criteria set forth in Dombrowski.
House Bill No. 546, Gen. Laws of Miss. 1964, c. 343.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
381 U.S. 741, 85 S. Ct. 1751, 14 L. Ed. 2d 715, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cameron-v-johnson-scotus-1965.