Brooks v. Dunlop Manufacturing Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedMay 18, 2012
Docket2012-1164
StatusUnpublished

This text of Brooks v. Dunlop Manufacturing Inc. (Brooks v. Dunlop Manufacturing Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brooks v. Dunlop Manufacturing Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

KENNETH C. BROOKS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

V.

DUNLOP MANUFACTURING INC., Defendant-Appellee,

AND UNITED STATES,

In.tervenor. *

2012-1164

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in case no. 10-CV-4341, Judge Charles R. Breyer.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The United States moves to reform the caption to identify the United States as an intervenor rather than a defendant.

BROOKS V. DUNLOP MANUFACTURING 2

Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT:

The motion to reform the official caption is granted The revised official caption is reflected above.

FoR THE CoURT

MA¥ 1 8 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk

cc: Adarn C. Jed, Esq. Kenneth C. Brooks, Esq. William J. Robinson, Esq.

. n 321 u.s.couni:i)'i§¢=missoa mersnsn_e)_csncuav

|"|AY 1 82012 JANHOBBALY CI.ERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Brooks v. Dunlop Manufacturing Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-dunlop-manufacturing-inc-cafc-2012.