FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 29
False marking
35 U.S.C. § 292
Title35 — Patents
Chapter29 — REMEDIES FOR INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT, AND OTHER ACTIONS
This text of 35 U.S.C. § 292 (False marking) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 292.
Text
(a)Whoever, without the consent of the patentee, marks upon, or affixes to, or uses in advertising in connection with anything made, used, offered for sale, or sold by such person within the United States, or imported by the person into the United States, the name or any imitation of the name of the patentee, the patent number, or the words "patent," "patentee," or the like, with the intent of counterfeiting or imitating the mark of the patentee, or of deceiving the public and inducing them to believe that the thing was made, offered for sale, sold, or imported into the United States by or with the consent of the patentee; or
Whoever marks upon, or affixes to, or uses in advertising in connection with any unpatented article, the word "patent" or any word or number importing that the same
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. Stevens
529 U.S. 765 (Supreme Court, 2000)
Stalley Ex Rel. United States v. Orlando Regional Healthcare System, Inc.
524 F.3d 1229 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)
Kemin Foods, L.C. v. Pigmentos Vegetales Del Centro S.A. De C.V.
464 F.3d 1339 (Federal Circuit, 2006)
Acoustic Systems, Inc. v. Wenger Corp.
207 F.3d 287 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)
Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co. v. Genesis Equipment & Manufacturing, Inc.
649 F. Supp. 2d 702 (N.D. Ohio, 2009)
Rohr Aircraft Corp. v. Rubber Teck, Inc.
266 F.2d 613 (Ninth Circuit, 1959)
Hayes Spray Gun Co. v. E. C. Brown Co.
291 F.2d 319 (Ninth Circuit, 1961)
Mainland Industries, Inc. v. Standal's Patents Ltd., and Roderick E. MacDonald as of the Estate of George M. Standal
799 F.2d 746 (Federal Circuit, 1986)
Raymond Boyd v. Schildkraut Giftware Corporation and D & E Trading Corporation
936 F.2d 76 (Second Circuit, 1991)
Filmon Process Corp. v. Hon. John J. Sirica, Judge, United States District Court for the District of Columbia
379 F.2d 449 (D.C. Circuit, 1967)
Filmon Process Corporation v. Spell-Right Corporation
404 F.2d 1351 (D.C. Circuit, 1968)
Pequignot v. Solo Cup Co.
640 F. Supp. 2d 714 (E.D. Virginia, 2009)
National Athletic Supply Corp. v. Tone-O-Matic Products, Inc., (Formerly Muscle-Matic, Inc.), (The) Big Three Glove Company, and Gilbert I. Smith
421 F.2d 407 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
Cornick v. Stry-Lenkoff Co.
134 F. Supp. 126 (W.D. Kentucky, 1955)
Mister Twister, Inc. v. JenEm Corp.
710 F. Supp. 202 (S.D. Ohio, 1989)
National Broiler Council v. Voss
851 F. Supp. 1461 (E.D. California, 1994)
Dethmers Manufacturing Co. v. Automatic Equipment Mfg. Co.
189 F.R.D. 526 (N.D. Iowa, 1999)
United States ex rel. Stinson, Lyons, Gerlin & Bustamante v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
736 F. Supp. 614 (D. New Jersey, 1990)
Flfmc, LLC v. Wham-O, Inc.
(Federal Circuit, 2011)
John Bean Technologies Corporation v. Morris & Associates, Inc.
(W.D. Arkansas, 2019)
Source Credit
History
(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 814; Pub. L. 103–465, title V, §533(b)(6), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4990; Pub. L. 112–29, §16(b)(1)–(3), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 329.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §50 (R.S. 4901).
This is a criminal provision. The first two paragraphs of the corresponding section of existing statute are consolidated, a new paragraph relating to false marking of "patent applied for" is added, and false advertising is included in all the offenses. The minimum fine which has been interpreted by the courts as a maximum, is replaced by a higher maximum. The informer action is included as additional to an ordinary criminal action.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2011—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 112–29, §16(b)(1), inserted at end "Only the United States may sue for the penalty authorized by this subsection."
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 112–29, §16(b)(2), amended subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (b) read as follows: "Any person may sue for the penalty, in which event one-half shall go to the person suing and the other to the use of the United States."
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 112–29, §16(b)(3), added subsec. (c).
1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–465, in first par., substituted "used, offered for sale, or sold by such person within the United States, or imported by the person into the United States" for "used, or sold by him" and "made, offered for sale, sold, or imported into the United States" for "made or sold".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Pub. L. 112–29, §16(b)(4), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 329, provided that: "The amendments made by this subsection [amending this section] shall apply to all cases, without exception, that are pending on, or commenced on or after, the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 16, 2011]."
Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–465 effective on date that is one year after date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States [Jan. 1, 1995], with provisions relating to earliest filed patent application, see section 534(a), (b)(3) of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as a note under section 154 of this title.
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §50 (R.S. 4901).
This is a criminal provision. The first two paragraphs of the corresponding section of existing statute are consolidated, a new paragraph relating to false marking of "patent applied for" is added, and false advertising is included in all the offenses. The minimum fine which has been interpreted by the courts as a maximum, is replaced by a higher maximum. The informer action is included as additional to an ordinary criminal action.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2011—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 112–29, §16(b)(1), inserted at end "Only the United States may sue for the penalty authorized by this subsection."
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 112–29, §16(b)(2), amended subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (b) read as follows: "Any person may sue for the penalty, in which event one-half shall go to the person suing and the other to the use of the United States."
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 112–29, §16(b)(3), added subsec. (c).
1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–465, in first par., substituted "used, offered for sale, or sold by such person within the United States, or imported by the person into the United States" for "used, or sold by him" and "made, offered for sale, sold, or imported into the United States" for "made or sold".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Pub. L. 112–29, §16(b)(4), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 329, provided that: "The amendments made by this subsection [amending this section] shall apply to all cases, without exception, that are pending on, or commenced on or after, the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 16, 2011]."
Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–465 effective on date that is one year after date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States [Jan. 1, 1995], with provisions relating to earliest filed patent application, see section 534(a), (b)(3) of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as a note under section 154 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/292.