Brooks v. Dunlop Manufacturing Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brooks v. Dunlop Manufacturing Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 702 F.3d 624
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided May 18, 2012·No. 2012-1164·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

KENNETH C. BROOKS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

V.

DUNLOP MANUFACTURING INC., Defendant-Appellee,

AND UNITED STATES,

In.tervenor. *

2012-1164

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in case no. 10-CV-4341, Judge Charles R. Breyer.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The United States moves to reform the caption to identify the United States as an intervenor rather than a defendant.

BROOKS V. DUNLOP MANUFACTURING 2

Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT:

The motion to reform the official caption is granted The revised official caption is reflected above.

FoR THE CoURT

MA¥ 1 8 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk

cc: Adarn C. Jed, Esq. Kenneth C. Brooks, Esq. William J. Robinson, Esq.

. n 321 u.s.couni:i)'i§¢=missoa mersnsn_e)_csncuav

|"|AY 1 82012 JANHOBBALY CI.ERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks v. Dunlop Manufacturing Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Brooks v. Dunlop Manufacturing Inc. (Brooks v. Dunlop Manufacturing Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.