Brooks v. Dunlop Manufacturing Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
KENNETH C. BROOKS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
V.
DUNLOP MANUFACTURING INC., Defendant-Appellee,
AND UNITED STATES,
In.tervenor. *
2012-1164
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in case no. 10-CV-4341, Judge Charles R. Breyer.
ON MOTION
ORDER
The United States moves to reform the caption to identify the United States as an intervenor rather than a defendant.
BROOKS V. DUNLOP MANUFACTURING 2
Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT:
The motion to reform the official caption is granted The revised official caption is reflected above.
FoR THE CoURT
MA¥ 1 8 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk
cc: Adarn C. Jed, Esq. Kenneth C. Brooks, Esq. William J. Robinson, Esq.
. n 321 u.s.couni:i)'i§¢=missoa mersnsn_e)_csncuav
|"|AY 1 82012 JANHOBBALY CI.ERK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brooks v. Dunlop Manufacturing Inc. (Brooks v. Dunlop Manufacturing Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.