Bradshaw v. Oklahoma State Election Board

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Bradshaw v. Oklahoma State Election Board

2004 OK 69, 98 P.3d 1092, 75 O.B.A.J. 2217, 2004 Okla. LEXIS 76, 2004 WL 1807950

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedAugust 13, 2004

Docket100,836

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 2004 OK 69 (Bradshaw v. Oklahoma State Election Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bradshaw v. Oklahoma State Election Board, 2004 OK 69, 98 P.3d 1092, 75 O.B.A.J. 2217, 2004 Okla. LEXIS 76, 2004 WL 1807950 (Okla. 2004).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER

1 1 Original jurisdiction is assumed and a writ of mandamus is hereby issued. The Oklahoma State Election Board is directed to place petitioner's name on the Oklahoma general election ballot as an Independent candidate for the office of United States Representative for the 4th District of Oklahoma. The provisions of 26 0.8. Supp.2004 § 5-105 [1093]*1093are, by their express terms, uninvocable against candidates for federal offices.

12 Glo Henley, Kenneth Monroe and Thomas E. Prince, to the extent that they are named in the caption hereof in their individual capacities, are not proper parties respondent. These individuals are proper parties respondent only in their official capacities as members of the Oklahoma State Election Board.

T3 Petitioner's request for costs and an attorney's fee is denied. Rule 1.191(}) of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules.

[4 WATT, C.J., OPALA, V.C.J., BOUDREAU and EDMONDSON, JJ. and SIMMS, SJ., concur; HODGES, HARGRAVE and KAUGER, JJ., dissent; LAVENDER, J., not participating; WINCHESTER, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI