Coleman v. Sequoyah County Election Board

1988 OK 96, 762 P.2d 935, 1988 Okla. LEXIS 108, 1988 WL 98128
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided September 15, 1988·No. 71661·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

*936 ORDER

Original jurisdiction is assumed.

There are no common law pre-election remedies to challenge the qualifications of a candidate for public office. The Legislature has provided in 26 O.S.1981 § 5-118 the exclusive method for a candidate to contest the candidacy of any other candidate. Murphy v. Darnell, 268 P.2d 860 (Okl.1954). A petition pursuant to § 5-118 must be filed no later than 5:00 p.m. on the second day following the close of the filing period. 26 O.S.1981 § 5-119. A petition for irregularities pursuant to 26 O.S.1981 § 8-120 may not be used by the petitioner as an alternative remedy to 26 O.S.1981 § 5-118. The petitioner’s petition filed three days after the primary election and contesting the candidacy of another candidate for the same office is untimely. 26 O.S.1981 § 5-119. The application for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition is denied.

DOOLIN, C.J., HARGRAVE, V.C.J., and HODGES, LAVENDER, SIMMS, OPALA, ALMA WILSON and SUMMERS, JJ., concur. KAUGER, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coleman v. Sequoyah County Election Board, 1988 OK 96, 762 P.2d 935, 1988 Okla. LEXIS 108, 1988 WL 98128 (Okla. 1988).

1988 OK 96 (Coleman v. Sequoyah County Election Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bradshaw v. Oklahoma State Election Board
2004 OK 69 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2004)
Opinion No. (2001)
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports, 2001
MacY v. Oklahoma City School District No. 89
1998 OK 58 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1998)
Henderson v. Maley
806 P.2d 626 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1991)