Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Bennett v. Bainbridge Farm Co.

Bennett v. Bainbridge Farm Co.

162 S.E. 134, 173 Ga. 856, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 426
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 16, 1931
DocketNos. 8615, 8652
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 162 S.E. 134 (Bennett v. Bainbridge Farm Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bennett v. Bainbridge Farm Co., 162 S.E. 134, 173 Ga. 856, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 426 (Ga. 1931).

Opinion

Hines, J.

A paper purporting to be a bill of exceptions, properly certified by the trial judge, but not signed by the plaintiff in error or his counsel, is not a legal bill of exceptions, confers no jurisdiction of the case upon this court, is not amendable to correct the defect, and will be dismissed with or without motion for that purpose. Speer v. Merryman, 56 Ga. 529; Brand v. Garrett, 62 Ga. 165; Wellborn v. Atlanta &c. R. Co., 92 Ga. 577 (17 S. E. 672); Sumner v. Sumner, 116 Ga. 798 (43 S. E. 57); O’Connell v. Friedman, 117 Ga. 949 (43 S. E. 100); Mitchell v. Tow, 147 Ga. 560 (94 S. E. 1012) ; Lott v. Waycross, 152 Ga. 237 (110 S. E. 217); Smith v. Jones, 155 Ga. 439 (117 S. E. 246).

Writs of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Highway Department v. Hester
143 S.E.2d 658 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
Strange v. Sloman
96 S.E.2d 610 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)
Henderson v. State
24 S.E.2d 72 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1943)
Kyle v. Huiet
17 S.E.2d 745 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Studstill v. State
170 S.E. 91 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 S.E. 134, 173 Ga. 856, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-bainbridge-farm-co-ga-1931.