Studstill v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Studstill v. State

170 S.E. 91, 47 Ga. App. 191, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 337

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 7, 1933·No. 23137·Published

Opinion

Guerry, J.

Tlie bill of exceptions in tbis case was unsigned when tendered to the trial judge on March 1st, which was the last day on which it could be tendered. The judge certifies that he did not discover that it was unsigned until March 3d, at which time he allowed counsel to sign it. Held, under the authority of O’Connell v. Friedman, 117 Ga. 948 (43 S. E. 1001), and Bennett v. Bainbridge Farm Co., 173 Ga. 856 (162 S. E. 134), and eit., that no legal bill of exceptions was tendered.

Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Guerry, J.

Tlie bill of exceptions in tbis case was unsigned when tendered to the trial judge on March 1st, which was the last day on which it could be tendered. The judge certifies that he did not discover that it was unsigned until March 3d, at which time he allowed counsel to sign it. Held, under the authority of O’Connell v. Friedman, 117 Ga. 948 (43 S. E. 1001), and Bennett v. Bainbridge Farm Co., 173 Ga. 856 (162 S. E. 134), and eit., that no legal bill of exceptions was tendered.

Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Studstill v. State, 170 S.E. 91, 47 Ga. App. 191, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 337 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

170 S.E. 91 (Studstill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related