Mitchell v. Yow

Supreme Court of Georgia

Mitchell v. Yow

94 S.E. 1012, 147 Ga. 560, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 32

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 18, 1918·No. No. 99·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

Neither plaintiff in error nor counsel having signed the purported bill of exceptions until after it was certified by the trial judge, this court is without .jurisdiction to consider the paper thus brought before it; and on motion the same is dismissed. Civil Code (1910), § 6139; Johnson v. Stevens, ante, 521 (94 S. E. 1011).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cubiam.

Neither plaintiff in error nor counsel having signed the purported bill of exceptions until after it was certified by the trial judge, this court is without .jurisdiction to consider the paper thus brought before it; and on motion the same is dismissed. Civil Code (1910), § 6139; Johnson v. Stevens, ante, 521 (94 S. E. 1011).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.

Mitchell v. Yow, 94 S.E. 1012, 147 Ga. 560, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 32 (Ga. 1918).

Pincite

94 S.E. 1012 (Mitchell v. Yow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related