Sumner v. Sumner

Supreme Court of Georgia

Sumner v. Sumner

43 S.E. 57, 116 Ga. 798, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 274

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedDecember 12, 1902

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 43 S.E. 57 (Sumner v. Sumner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sumner v. Sumner, 43 S.E. 57, 116 Ga. 798, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 274 (Ga. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

Fish, J.

A paper purporting to be a bill of exceptions, but not signed by the plaintiff in error or bis counsel when certified by the trial judge, is not a legal bill of exceptions, and can not, over objection, be amended in the Supreme Court by attaching counsel’s name thereto. Upon motion, it will be dismissed. Civil Code, § 5527 ; Speer v. Merryman, 56 Ga. 529; Wellborn v. Railroad Co., 92 Ga. 577; Cook v. Banks, 95 Ga. 229.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fish, J.

A paper purporting to be a bill of exceptions, but not signed by the plaintiff in error or bis counsel when certified by the trial judge, is not a legal bill of exceptions, and can not, over objection, be amended in the Supreme Court by attaching counsel’s name thereto. Upon motion, it will be dismissed. Civil Code, § 5527 ; Speer v. Merryman, 56 Ga. 529; Wellborn v. Railroad Co., 92 Ga. 577; Cook v. Banks, 95 Ga. 229.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 S.E. 57, 116 Ga. 798, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sumner-v-sumner-ga-1902.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack