Sumner v. Sumner
43 S.E. 57, 116 Ga. 798, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 274
Opinion
A paper purporting to be a bill of exceptions, but not signed by the plaintiff in error or bis counsel when certified by the trial judge, is not a legal bill of exceptions, and can not, over objection, be amended in the Supreme Court by attaching counsel’s name thereto. Upon motion, it will be dismissed. Civil Code, § 5527 ; Speer v. Merryman, 56 Ga. 529; Wellborn v. Railroad Co., 92 Ga. 577; Cook v. Banks, 95 Ga. 229.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sumner v. Sumner, 43 S.E. 57, 116 Ga. 798, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 274 (Ga. 1902).
43 S.E. 57 (Sumner v. Sumner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Irvin v. Augusta-Richmond County Board of Zoning Appeals
129 S.E.2d 544 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Graham v. Continental Casualty Co.
100 S.E.2d 597 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Kyle v. Huiet
17 S.E.2d 745 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Bennett v. Bainbridge Farm Co.
162 S.E. 134 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Stanfield v. Goodrich Rubber Co.
149 S.E. 282 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Cook v. Walker
131 S.E. 288 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)
Johnson v. Stevens
94 S.E. 1011 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)
Moss v. Myers
76 S.E. 768 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic Railroad v. Barnwell
75 S.E. 645 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)
Winn v. State
53 S.E. 318 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
O'Connell Bros. v. Friedman, Keiler & Co.
43 S.E. 1001 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)