Smith v. Jones
117 S.E. 246, 155 Ga. 439, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 89
Opinion
“ A paper purporting to be a bill of exceptions, properly certified by the trial judge, hut not signed by the plaintiff in error or his counsel, is not a legal hill of exceptions,” and this court has no jurisdiction of the case. “ It appearing that this court has no jurisdiction, it will dismiss such writ of error of its own motion.” Lott v. City of Waycross, 152 Ga. 237 (110 S. E. 217).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Jones, 117 S.E. 246, 155 Ga. 439, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 89 (Ga. 1923).
117 S.E. 246 (Smith v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kyle v. Huiet
17 S.E.2d 745 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Bennett v. Bainbridge Farm Co.
162 S.E. 134 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Cook v. Walker
131 S.E. 288 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)