Smith v. Jones

Supreme Court of Georgia

Smith v. Jones

117 S.E. 246, 155 Ga. 439, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 89

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 11, 1923

DocketNo. 3568

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 117 S.E. 246 (Smith v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Jones, 117 S.E. 246, 155 Ga. 439, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 89 (Ga. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

“ A paper purporting to be a bill of exceptions, properly certified by the trial judge, hut not signed by the plaintiff in error or his counsel, is not a legal hill of exceptions,” and this court has no jurisdiction of the case. “ It appearing that this court has no jurisdiction, it will dismiss such writ of error of its own motion.” Lott v. City of Waycross, 152 Ga. 237 (110 S. E. 217).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert, J.

“ A paper purporting to be a bill of exceptions, properly certified by the trial judge, hut not signed by the plaintiff in error or his counsel, is not a legal hill of exceptions,” and this court has no jurisdiction of the case. “ It appearing that this court has no jurisdiction, it will dismiss such writ of error of its own motion.” Lott v. City of Waycross, 152 Ga. 237 (110 S. E. 217).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 S.E. 246, 155 Ga. 439, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-jones-ga-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack