Brand v. Garrett
62 Ga. 165
Opinion
[Wabneb, Chief Justice, was providentially prevented from presiding in this case. ]
The bill of exceptions in this case not being signed by the party plaintiff or the attorney according to the Code, §4351, must be dismissed. The indorsement of the name of the attorney on the back of the bill of exceptions is not such signing it as is contemplated and required by the Code.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brand v. Garrett, 62 Ga. 165 (Ga. 1878).
62 Ga. 165 (Brand v. Garrett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Strange v. Sloman
96 S.E.2d 610 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)
Kyle v. Huiet
17 S.E.2d 745 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Bennett v. Bainbridge Farm Co.
162 S.E. 134 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Hester v. State
140 S.E. 777 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
O'Connell Bros. v. Friedman, Keiler & Co.
43 S.E. 1001 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)