Hester v. State

140 S.E. 777, 37 Ga. App. 503, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 370
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 13, 1927
Docket18507
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 140 S.E. 777 (Hester v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hester v. State, 140 S.E. 777, 37 Ga. App. 503, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 370 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Brotles, O. J.

The bill of exceptions in this case, not having been signed by the plaintiff in error or his attorney, must be dismissed. The indorsement of the name of the attorney on the back of the bill of exceptions is not a signing within the meaning of the statute. Brand v. Garrett, 62 Ga. 165.

Writ of error dismissed.

Luke and Blood/worth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wells v. State
186 S.E. 593 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 S.E. 777, 37 Ga. App. 503, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hester-v-state-gactapp-1927.