Alec Marsh v. J. Alexander's LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 16, 2018
Docket15-15791
StatusPublished

This text of Alec Marsh v. J. Alexander's LLC (Alec Marsh v. J. Alexander's LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alec Marsh v. J. Alexander's LLC, (9th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 16 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALEC MARSH, No. 15-15791

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-01038-SMM District of Arizona, v. Phoenix

J. ALEXANDER'S LLC, ORDER

Defendant-Appellee.

CRYSTAL SHEEHAN, No. 15-15794

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-00464-SMM

v.

ROMULUS INCORPORATED, DBA International House of Pancakes,

Defendant-Appellee. SILVIA ALARCON, No. 15-16561

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-00465-SMM

ARRIBA ENTERPRISES INCORPORATED, DBA Arriba Mexican Grill,

SAROSHA HOGAN; NICHOLAS No. 15-16659 JACKSON; SKYLAR VAZQUEZ; THOMAS ARMSTRONG; PHILIP TODD; D.C. Nos. 2:14-cv-00051-SMM MARIA HURKMANS, 2:14-cv-00766-SMM 2:14-cv-00768-SMM Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:14-cv-00769-SMM 2:14-cv-01243-SMM v. 2:14-cv-01244-SMM

AMERICAN MULTI-CINEMA, INC., DBA AMC Theatres Esplanade 14,

NATHAN LLANOS, an individual, No. 16-15003

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-00261-SMM

P.F. CHANG'S CHINA BISTRO, INC.,

2 KRISTEN ROMERO, an individual, No. 16-15004

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-00262-SMM

ANDREW FIELDS, an individual, No. 16-15005

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-00263-SMM

ALTO WILLIAMS, No. 16-15118

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-01467-SMM

AMERICAN BLUE RIBBON HOLDINGS LLC,

3 STEPHANIE R. FAUSNACHT, No. 16-16033

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-01561-SMM

LION'S DEN MANAGEMENT, LLC, DBA Denny's,

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure

35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in these cases shall

not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Murguia did not participate in the deliberations or vote in these cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Alec Marsh v. J. Alexander's LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alec-marsh-v-j-alexanders-llc-ca9-2018.