FEDERAL · 5 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—EXAMINATION, CERTIFICATION, AND APPOINTMENT

Preference eligibles; examinations; crediting experience

5 U.S.C. § 3311
Title5Government Organization and Employees
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—EXAMINATION, CERTIFICATION, AND APPOINTMENT

This text of 5 U.S.C. § 3311 (Preference eligibles; examinations; crediting experience) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
5 U.S.C. § 3311.

Text

In examinations for the competitive service in which experience is an element of qualification, a preference eligible is entitled to credit—

(1)for service in the armed forces when his employment in a similar vocation to that for which examined was interrupted by the service; and
(2)for all experience material to the position for which examined, including experience gained in religious, civic, welfare, service, and organizational activities, regardless of whether he received pay therefor.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lazaro v. Department of Veterans Affairs
666 F.3d 1316 (Federal Circuit, 2012)
80 case citations
Kirkendall v. Department of the Army
573 F.3d 1318 (Federal Circuit, 2009)
42 case citations
Riller v. Federal Deposit Insurance
818 F.3d 1361 (Federal Circuit, 2016)
32 case citations
Crowley v. United States
527 F.2d 1176 (Court of Claims, 1975)
28 case citations
Cyril Oram v. Department of the Navy
2022 MSPB 30 (Merit Systems Protection Board, 2022)
27 case citations
Schoenrogge v. Department of Justice
385 F. App'x 996 (Federal Circuit, 2010)
3 case citations
Asatov v. Department of Labor
542 F. App'x 930 (Federal Circuit, 2013)
2 case citations
Marlon Holloway v. Department of the Air Force
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2016)
John Paul Jones, III v. Armed Forces Retirement Home
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2016)
Eric Williams v. Department of Defense
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2022)
Anthony Muzereus v. Department of the Army
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2023)
Eric Williams v. Department of the Navy
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2022)
Williams v. Defense
(Federal Circuit, 2023)
Harold K Gause v. Railroad Retirement Board
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2024)
Jones v. Department of Health & Human Services
705 F. App'x 972 (Federal Circuit, 2017)
Anthony Salazar v. Department of Veterans Affairs
2024 MSPB 11 (Merit Systems Protection Board, 2024)
Sack v. Bentsen
858 F. Supp. 285 (D. Massachusetts, 1994)

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 420.)

Editorial Notes

The words "for the competitive service" are added after "examinations" for clarity. Application of this section to the excepted service in the executive branch and to the government of the District of Columbia, as provided in former section 858, is carried into section 3320.
In paragraph (1), the words "service in the armed forces" are substituted for "in the military or naval service of the United States" on authority of the Act of July 26, 1947, ch. 343, §305(a), 61 Stat. 508. The word "actual" is omitted as surplusage.
In paragraph (2), the words "material to the position for which examined" are substituted for "valuable" for clarity.
Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 U.S.C. § 3311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/5/3311.