FEDERAL · 42 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER XVI—ENERGY EMPLOYEES OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS COMPENSATION PROGRAM
Exposure in the performance of duty
42 U.S.C. § 7384n
Title42 — The Public Health and Welfare
ChapterSUBCHAPTER XVI—ENERGY EMPLOYEES OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS COMPENSATION PROGRAM
PartB
This text of 42 U.S.C. § 7384n (Exposure in the performance of duty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
42 U.S.C. § 7384n.
Text
(a)Beryllium
A covered beryllium employee shall, in the absence of substantial evidence to the contrary, be determined to have been exposed to beryllium in the performance of duty for the purposes of the compensation program if, and only if, the covered beryllium employee was—
(1)employed at a Department of Energy facility; or
(2)present at a Department of Energy facility, or a facility owned and operated by a beryllium vendor, because of employment by the United States, a beryllium vendor, or a contractor or subcontractor of the Department of Energy,
during a period when beryllium dust, particles, or vapor may have been present at such facility.
(b)Cancer
An individual with cancer specified in subclause (I), (II), or (III) of section 7384l(9)(B)(ii) of this title shall be determined t
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Harger v. Department of Labor
569 F.3d 898 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Hayward v. United States Department of Labor
536 F.3d 376 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)
Stephens v. U.S. Department of Labor
571 F. Supp. 2d 186 (District of Columbia, 2008)
Willingham v. Department of Labor
475 F. Supp. 2d 607 (N.D. Texas, 2007)
David Hous. v. U.S. Dep't of Labor
318 F. Supp. 3d 1028 (W.D. Kentucky, 2018)
Young v. United States Department of Labor
(District of Columbia, 2021)
Opal Harger v. Department of Labor
(Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Still v. United States Department of Labor
(District of Columbia, 2020)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [div. C, title XXXVI, §3623], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–502; Pub. L. 108–375, div. C, title XXXI, §3168(b), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2190.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Section 7(b) of the Orphan Drug Act, referred to in subsec. (c)(3)(A), is section 7(b) of Pub. L. 97–414, which is set out in a note under section 241 of this title.
Executive Order No. 12344, referred to in subsec. (c)(4)(A), is set out as a note under section 6102 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
Amendments
2004—Subsec. (c)(4). Pub. L. 108–375 added par. (4).
Executive Documents
Delegation of Functions
For delegation of certain functions of the President under this section, see Ex. Ord. No. 13179, Dec. 7, 2000, 65 F.R. 77487, set out as a note under section 7384 of this title.
References in Text
Section 7(b) of the Orphan Drug Act, referred to in subsec. (c)(3)(A), is section 7(b) of Pub. L. 97–414, which is set out in a note under section 241 of this title.
Executive Order No. 12344, referred to in subsec. (c)(4)(A), is set out as a note under section 6102 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
Amendments
2004—Subsec. (c)(4). Pub. L. 108–375 added par. (4).
Executive Documents
Delegation of Functions
For delegation of certain functions of the President under this section, see Ex. Ord. No. 13179, Dec. 7, 2000, 65 F.R. 77487, set out as a note under section 7384 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
42 U.S.C. § 7384n, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/42/7384n.